A vision paper for agentic code review
Position/vision piece on how code review should change when AI agents author and critique changes across the SDLC.
Source: Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review
This is a vision paper, not a new bench: it sketches what review becomes when agents are first-class authors and critics. Useful as a map of open problems—roles, trust, escalation, and how human reviewers relocate from line nits to system-level judgment.
Read it as a design brief for platform teams building review into agentic pipelines, not as empirical proof.
Why it matters for code review
Before you wire five agents into every PR, you want a coherent target state. This paper is a compact way to pressure-test whether your roadmap is “faster comments” or an actual redesign of review as an agentic protocol.